Jump to content

AustinBike

Members
  • Posts

    3,821
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    162

Posts posted by AustinBike

  1. 1 hour ago, AntonioGG said:

    What trail are you doing?  Are you having to go into Wisconsin?

    I am riding Palos Hills. That is THE mountain bike trail in the Chicago area. The emphasis is there to say that it is both the best trail in the area and the only trail in the area.

    As for Wisconsin, I have ridden Kettle Moraine, but that is essentially Walnut Creek with better shade.

    • Like 1
  2. Rented a "mountain bike" to ride today in Chicago. Basket. Seatpost shock. Fat "comfort" saddle. The funniest part was that I brought shoes and pedals (riding a trail tomorrow) but they did not have a pedal wrench. Even funnier was that the plastic pedals had hex bolt and not standard pedals. The girl had no clue and asked if the pedal/shoes that I had was some new thing that they are doing now.

    Let's just say that I used to do this ride all the time when I lived here, but in the ~25 years that I have been gone they have really done a good job on the lakefront. Literally no elevation, welcome to the midwest. Did about 12 miles and then turned around to head back north and got hammered by a headwind all the way back. But the weather played nice today.

     

    IMG_4590.jpg

    IMG_4595.jpg

    IMG_4599.jpg

    • Like 3
  3. 1 hour ago, Ridenfool said:

    Makes me recall the thong rider in SA that was on Mojo. He rode everywhere, to work, or trail, wearing only a thong. I'm happy to have never had to witness that first-hand and still wish nobody had posted pics.

    I have ridden behind him (and drank night train at his house before a ride...in the morning.)

    Not as bad as the 2 thong guys in Austin (north and south).

  4. 4 hours ago, throet said:

    I've never wore pads and likely never will, but don't believe that if I did I would feel any safer. Maybe that argument would hold true with complete body armor, but I have to believe that only a small percentage of MTB injuries would be prevented by knee pads or elbow pads. And I'm not talking about scrapes and bruises, which don't concern me. I've injured shoulder/chest, ribs, toes, fingers, neck, face, and now hamstring while mountain biking. None of these would have been prevented by wearing knee or elbow pads. 

    Next time you go for a ride try this. Shoes, helmet and a swimsuit. Nothing else. Let me know how much safer you ride 😉

    I can tell you that I am more aggressive in the colder weather with layers and long sleeves relative to hotter weather.

  5. 16 hours ago, CBaron said:

     

    We were discussing this topic in a different light the other day at the office.  The comment was that Spider Mountain's terrain is really no more difficult or challenging that significant part of the BCGB backcountry trails.  Therefore, is there really a need for FF helmet and other extra gear?  The conclusion we came to (and the similar one that I apply when riding my MX bike [say, especially at CP where I ride both MX & MTB]) is that of velocity.  At Spider Mtn (and on an MX bike) you seem to be traveling at such a greater rate of speed, with just a touch of the throttle or ease of the brake lever, and your velocity increases dramatically.  YMMV

     

    Later, -CJB

    I have another angle on this.

    I don't own pads, I don't wear pads (that may change one day, especially for a place like Bentonville.)

    My reasoning is pretty simple. In my mind, having pads will encourage me to take more risks. I believe I am more likely to crash with pads on because I am doing something that is outside of my comfort zone.

    There are those that argue that to have fun you need to always be outside of your comfort zone and always need to be pushing for more. I disagree with this position. I have a ton of fun riding at my skill level and I do push myself, but I take smart risks, not stupid risks. I believe pads would encourage stupid risks so I stay clear, for now.

    • Like 3
  6. 2 hours ago, Nando said:

    I love it, and at that price, a good deal. But, alas, that’s about twice my budget.

    Nando, what is your budget? I might have a nice steel hardtail with some decent components (SRAM x.0, Chris King wheels, etc.) that I can get in your budget. We should talk.

    • Like 1
  7. 1 hour ago, mcfly said:

    I actually might be willing to spend the money to drop the weight, but the showstopper for me, as others have mentioned, is that I'm just as likely to give away my spare tube than use it myself, and ain't no way I'm giving away a $35 tube, or trying to explain to someone that it's a $35 tube.

    yeah, I can see this "crap, I have a flat, does anyone have a tube?" "ummm.....no"

    You can either give away your $35 tube and get a $5 doubly sized replacement back (sometime in the future), give them a $35 tube and never receive anything back, tell them you have a tube but it costs $35 and they need to replace it, or lie to them.

    None of those four options is good.

  8. 2 minutes ago, Yosmithy said:

    How I found out about this was through a Jeff Lenosky video about tire puncture. He was promoting this as and option to carrying a backup tube for those that run tubeless. 

    I do agree, it is a small form factor, and yes, some weight loss, but holy shit, $35 dollars???

    I currently just carry a spare tube strapped to my frame, and other than having to remove it every 6 months when I wash my bike, I don't even notice it.

    I'm normally not a tight wad when it comes to bike "stuff", but this is ridiculous

    Honestly, I would not be surprised to find the vendor shipped him some free ones. If I received free ones I'd probably be raving about how great they are. It's the physical act of buying them that suddenly makes them unreasonable. As a giveaway from the vendor they are awesome.

    • Like 1
  9. Tubes are awesome for trailside patching of tubeless flats. I happen to know someone that has had several tubeless flats recently. First the bacon. Then putting more Stan's in. Then finally pulling out the tube. Yeah, there are ways to fix a tubeless flat but most of the time I's done and having a cold beer while they are continuing to try things to patch their tire. Just put a tube in it. Oh, and don't pay $35 for that tube.

  10. This is an awesome solution in search of a problem.

    If weight is your issue, then tubeless will wipe it out, hands down.

    If puncture is your issue, then tubeless will wipe it out, hands down.

    If cost is your issue, then tubeless will wipe it out, hands down.

    If space is your issue, then tubeless will wipe it out, hands down.

    I fail to see how this will beat tubeless in any relevant manner. What this does beat is traditional tubes. It is essentially sits in between a traditional tube and tubeless, but has a hefty price tag. I fail to see where the market need is for this product.

    I have heavy, relatively cheap, tubes in my urban bike for riding on the streets. I have tubeless on my mountain bikes for riding on the trails. This would be used in neither place for me. The only benefit is that it is smaller so it takes up less room in my pack, but at ~$30 more than a standard tube, I am happy to carry a normal tube and drop that money on a good case of IPA.

    • Like 1
  11. 46 minutes ago, 4fun said:

    They got bought out by am sports and hobbies or something like that who was already successful online and just put a performance and nashbar skin on the website they already had. The prices are the exact same now on both nashbar and performance and prices a-line with the rest of the industry.

    Less about pricing and website, more about inventory and back-end logistics. That is where the real financial problems arise.

  12. Retail shut down, now trying to compete with online only. That is a tough hill to climb because they are up against Amazon with massive fulfillment capability and they are trying to maintain their own inventory and fulfillment mechanisms. I don't see them competing long-term, not because online people can't compete, but because if you start with a retail mentality it is hard to rid your organizations of that mindset. Strictly retail will do OK (if they understand where their money is made) and pure online will do ok if they, again, find their niche. But the combo model has never fared well. Just getting rid of retail stores does not mean that they have also gotten rid of the retail mindset.

  13. I have not had an issue with the PNW or KS dropper levers. Clearly there are better ones on the market but I guess, like many other things bike related, I don't have a strong opinion on the difference. The only thing that bugged me about the KS lever was that because it was small, it would slip in sweaty conditions. I put some stuff on the button to give it more of a grip. A $3 solution that works fine now.

    • Like 1
  14. 10 hours ago, jcarneytx said:

    OR....several people in front of you, you ring your bell, they SPLIT and step off to BOTH sides, giving you only a narrow path between them. Move left or right, I don't care, but PLEASE go the same way. So much easier to go around than squeeze between. Why don't people get that?

    Was just talking about that on yesterday's ride. The literal worst part of that is when the people on the left go right and the people on the right go left. So not only do they give you a narrow corridor to pass, but they basically block the trail while they are jockeying for position.

    • Like 1
  15. 14 hours ago, DirtSurfer said:

    That's a great technique,  you even come across as the nice guy and get them to leash up.  Is it really 500 fine per dog?  Thats pretty steep!  

    Yep, $500 per dog. And to the entitled ass who walks her 5+ dogs off leash at WC who claims she is "in control of them" in the non-leash area, I pray that one day she meets up with a cop. I just don't get people sometimes.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...